
The "Smart Disciplinary Measurement Platform" of Chengdu Weitong Information Technology Co., Ltd. refers to a digital disciplinary measurement and adjudication assistance system that utilizes the advantages of artificial intelligence algorithm tools to perform data calculations on factors affecting disciplinary measurement and adjudication in cases, and provides objective, precise, and personalized disciplinary measurement and adjudication suggestions.
The "Disciplinary Measurement and Punishment System" refers to the process where cases of disciplinary violations handled by the Commission for Discipline Inspection (CDIC) are first internally reviewed by the grassroots CDIC, and then submitted to the review department of the superior CDIC for verification and approval. After the review department of the superior CDIC reviews and provides feedback, the lower-level Party committee or CDIC makes a disciplinary decision. The grassroots CDIC handles a large number of cases with various types. Due to the uneven level of case handlers in the grassroots CDIC, it is easy to misjudge the factors for disciplinary measurement and punishment in practice, resulting in imbalances and inconsistencies in the results of disciplinary measurement and punishment, and even the phenomenon of disproportionately lenient or severe disciplinary measures. This undoubtedly affects the efficiency of case handling by the county and township CDICs, and even undermines the fairness and authority of the supervision and discipline enforcement of the CDICs at these two levels.
The construction of a smart discipline measurement platform has the following significance: Firstly, it improves the efficiency of case handling by the discipline inspection commissions at both levels. The smart discipline measurement platform can list the factors for measuring and deciding on discipline in various types of cases. Case handlers only need to follow the platform's prompts and check the factors according to the list to quickly generate an accurate discipline measurement report. Secondly, it standardizes the discretionary behavior of case handlers in measuring and deciding on discipline. The smart discipline measurement platform objectively quantifies various factors that affect the discretionary decision-making process, which can minimize the subjectivity of manual measurement and discretion, and restrict the abuse of discretion by individuals. Thirdly, it provides a basis for decision-making. The smart discipline measurement platform has a visual feature, which can extract various factors that affect the discretionary decision-making process and present them in a visual form to decision-makers, providing a reliable basis for their final decision. Fourthly, it has the function of "persuading" the parties involved. The smart discipline measurement platform acts as an objective third-party arbitrator without subjective emotions. The conclusions drawn through objective calculations by the platform have strong "persuasive" power for the parties involved in the case, effectively reducing the likelihood of improper appeals by the parties.

